You must log in or register to comment.
- 6 months
Reverse engineering, a.k.a. looking at something. Now illegal, brought to you by capitalism
- 6 months
Without reverse engineering, there is no security. No way to find new bugs and vulnerabilities or confirm it’s backdoor free. Just blind trust only.
- 6 months
It offers protection from crackers and cybergangs too, because they always follow laws. /s
- 6 months
Reverse engineering prohibitions are the dumbest things.
Let’s say I do this. Arduino sues me. Okay. Now what? What money are they going to take?
Hell, this would be a perfect time for everyone to form an LLC and purchase Arduinos as the LLC and then release your research under your corporate name as CC0. If your LLC has no revenue, you as an individual are legally protected.
Arduino can try to put the genie back in the bottle but good luck.
Better companies than Arduino have tried to prevent hardware reverse engineering and have failed. Apple being the biggest company I can think of that have tried to sue people for releasing schematics of their motherboards.
- 6 months
They can’t take your money but they can bury you into the ground and use you as an example so that no one ever tries to do the same thing. Ever heard of Aaron Schwartz?
- psud@aussie.zoneEnglish6 months
It’s still legal in Australia, at least, we never got the anti-circumvention rule the US media companies got into the US trade agreements
Or rather we did, but they have exceptions that cover just about every otherwise legal use case. I can legally decrypt media to play on my Linux machine, for example. I think the only thing we can’t legally do is circumvent controls to do copyright violation
- 6 months
Maybe it’s just what I’ve been noticing, but I feel like Arduino was already losing its share of the hobbyist market. The plethora of small, cheap esp32 devices have already been taking Arduino’s place.
- 6 months
Same with raspberrypi really.
companies just can’t seem to know how to grow without line go up mentality.- TheOneCurly@feddit.onlineEnglish6 months
That’s just it, you don’t need to grow. Just sell a useful product at a reasonable price.
- 6 months
In capitalism, the consumer isn’t the target audience. A business exists to make money. The more money you make, the more shareholders you gain, the more the shareholders demand BLOOD!
- 6 months
???
You don’t need to take your company public, you know?
You can just stay its sole owner, then no one can force you to do anything with it (except for a judge).- 6 months
Depends on the laws. In certain situations, you may be forced to sell part/all of you company.
Besides the legal ways, someone may threaten you or something demanding that you sell it, its not impossible.
- psud@aussie.zoneEnglish6 months
I think that only happens if you manage to acquire a monopoly and are forced to break up your company - I’m not entirely sure you have to sell parts of it publicly even then
Unless the someone happens to be the owner.
- 6 months
They seem to forget that “line go up” isn’t the primary objective. If you make a good product and give half a shit about your customers, the line goes up as a natural consequence.
- theneverfox@pawb.socialEnglish6 months
companies just can’t seem to know how to grow without line go up mentality.
That’s like saying “people just can’t seem to harness the advantages of cancer without dying”
If you never take money and get hooked by outside sources, you can just slowly grow, with no debt, beholden to no one
If you take the money with any strings attached at all, you basically have to grow like cancer or your company will be sold for parts. It’s inevitable at that point
Don’t take the money kids. If you have to take a business loan in the beginning - fine,
- andioop@programming.devEnglish6 months
was the comma a typo of a period, or did you have more to say here? if you have more to say i’m eager to listen
- theneverfox@pawb.socialEnglish6 months
I meant to delete the comment to keep things simple, but what I was going to say is something like
fine, but debt is like gambling. There’s situations where it makes sense, but it’s addictive. It’s mortgaging your own future, even when it maths out it’s a risk - shit happens
And if you over leverage and under perform, it’s over. If you can pay yourself and your employees, you’re better off never taking on debt again.
Like Wegmans. It’s the very best grocery store, everyone who goes there agrees. They grow slowly because they only open new locations when they have the cash to do so, and so they never have to compromise on quality in any way
6 monthsOdd that the newer RP2350 has a lower clock speed, while being improved in most other respects. Is that why the RP2040 is still seemingly the community preference?
Feature RP2040 RP2350 Package QFN-56EP QFN-60EP or QFN-80EP CPU Cores 2 × ARM Cortex-M0+ 2 × ARM Cortex-M33 (w/FPU), 2 × Hazard3 RISC-V CPU Clock 200 MHz[5] 150 MHz SRAM 264 KB, 6 banks 520 KB, 10 banks Flash None None (RP2350), 2 MB (RP2354) OTP None 8 KB DMA 12 chan, 2 IRQ 16 chan, 4 IRQ PIO 2 (8 state machines) 3 (12 state machines) PWM 16 24 ADC 4-chan 12-bit ADC 4-chan 12-bit (QFN-60EP), 8-chan 12-bit (QFN-80EP) DAC None None HSTX None One Engines ? RNG, SHA-256 - 6 months
Personally, I never really counted the RP2350 as a successor. It’s a different animal completely. A 2040 successor would be something like 4x cortex-m0’s or a faster clock with more ram or whatever, the 2350 has completed different capabilities and components and can live along side the 2040.
I feel like the preferred one is the 2040 simply because it’s cheaper, and capable enough for the vast majority of use cases at this point.
Edit: yes I know RPI called their board using the 2350 the pico 2, but the 2040 chip itself is used in more places than just the pico and not every one used the 2350 as a v2.
- Tavi@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish6 months
Cheap. Also, a large part of the tinkering community never moves past soldering or perf board + lack of cheap 2354 boards. 2040 is already good enough for keebs and most projects. 2350 had eratta E9 published (gpio lockup) which killed its initial adoption rate for more advanced projects PicoLogicAnalyzer, protocol emulation, etc.
- 6 months
I’m getting into meshtastic and learned how those esp32 devices are everywhere! They seem pretty neat
- andioop@programming.devEnglish6 months
Hey thanks! I was wondering what my alternatives were. Bought RPis, having remembered that name from a decade ago, and then read the posts here about how those are getting worse. Glad to see something that could take their place for my next project :) This is the kind of stuff I come to programming.dev for.
There are clones now more open than arduino that we can buy. In addition esp32 and other small boards are awesome.
- 6 months
But how many of those esp32s are programmed using the Arduino IDE and Arduino libraries?
- 6 months
Many. But there too, I’m seeing many people move to VScode + platformio. I’m not saying Arduino is already dead, I’m just saying that the alternatives were already gaining ground.
- 6 months
I mean, it’s either that or a vendor-independent ecosystem. And this rarely gets fostered by vendors.
- 6 months
I love the ESP32, was onboard with the ESP-8266 (might have the numbers wrong, it was the predecessor), but I thought the real difference between the ESP-32 and the Rpi was that the Rpi has an OS with a possible desktop even (and all that Libux has to offer basically), as the ESP is more of a uProcessor you program in C/C++?
Edit: Plesse disregard, I mixed up the posts and posted one levet too high too…
- 6 months
To answer your question anyway, raspberry Pi made the rp2040 chip, which is a microcontroller similar to the esp, instead of a full fat computer SOC
- 6 months
Arduino has its place for self-taught hobbyists. For a lot of projects, a simple code is more than enough, so there is no point of going into the more advanced mcu like esp32 or stm32.
- 6 months
Not since the pi pico came out.
It’s cheaper, more capable, and you can still use arduino code if you want.- 6 months
I can find an arduino nano clone for 3$. There are use case for ultra cheap electronics like that.
- 6 months
I can find the official Pi Pico for $3.50, I’m sure clones are cheaper than that.
- rumba@lemmy.zipEnglish6 months
You are not wrong. Took a trip down that path for a friend, helping him create some items, which was frustratingly limited.
It is, however, super easy if you don’t want/need much.
I hate to see options disappear, even if we have other reasonable options available.
- 6 months
I was always surprised why the TI line of MSP430s didn’t take better. Guess their marketing was bullshit 🤷.
- 6 months
All the open hardware and software and ecosystem was pretty cool. It was cool you could just buy hats, or whatever they’re called, to add functionality, rather than designing a custom PCB and spending hundreds of dollars to get a few boards made and populated. I’m not a fan of their software stack or their choice of uC’s, but they did make it easy to just kind of plug stuff together in hardware and software.
- 6 months
Arduino has been irrelevant for a while. There are better alternatives for everything they offer. For a start, take a look at Raspberry Pi’s microcontrollers.
- rumba@lemmy.zipEnglish6 months
There are already several places chomping at the bit to unseat them as the SBC default.
- Tavi@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish6 months
ST looming in the background, NXP desperately trying to smash their own kneecaps with a hammer and failing. ESP getting hit with a lightning bolt every time they try to read documentation they printed out but not when its digital…
- Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.worldEnglish6 months
The closest they’ve come so far is prioritizing industrial customers and compute modules for a while during a chip shortage, to my memory. Hopefully they stick to their roots in the hobbyist/educational sector.
- 6 months
To be fair, if most of your funding (source needed) comes from industrial customers, not supplying them is a good way to lose their patronage.
So even if it sucked for hobbyists at that moment, keeping a big player like RbP viable for the long term might not be too bad of a tradeoff.
- 6 months
I stay away from all the micro tech drama and I feel like two years ago, that community was bitching that raspberry pi sold out and everyone should switch to arduino.
I don’t have a side. I just pick whatever is easiest to make a emulation station.
- 6 months
RbP created a publicly traded company for their hardware, which is almost-wholly-held by Raspberry Pi Foundation, which is a charity.
That sort of thing ought not be allowed, ever. It’s similar to the path Arduino took to get here. There are still other competitors, but for the time being I’m happy enough with RbPi’s dirt-cheap microcontrollers. Their mini-PCs are a different story. We’re already seeing enshittification and price gouging there. It’s just a matter of time.
- atomicbocks@sh.itjust.worksEnglish6 months
I agree that it shouldn’t be allowed. But for what it’s worth, a lot of non-profits that have a product do this. Mozilla for instance.
- 6 months
Yeah, I remember when the prices were high for a raspberry pi, I think it was $45, I went on Newegg and found a full size motherboard for $50. I mean, if you are looking for small that’s no good, but if cheap was all you were going for at that time, the pi wasn’t that great.
- cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish6 months
You can also use the Arduino hardware without their IDE or libraries. You just need avr-gcc, avr-libc and a makefile. The AVR microcontrollers are very easy to program. The Arduino libraries really just get in the way once you need to do anything with timers.
- 6 months
You can get an arduino clone for a lot cheaper than you can get an rpi clone.
Sometimes, you just need something very simple and a cheap arduino is the right choice.
Arduino is also a lot more user friendly for newcomers.
It’s a shame that Qualcomm will be the end of it.
- infinitesunrise@slrpnk.netEnglish6 months
True, but you can’t just port arduino code to python or whatever language the raspberry picos compile from. An arduino project would have to be completely rewritten, as far as I’m aware.
- 6 months
you can program a Pi Pico with the Arduino IDE in C++. Some projects will just compile if you aren’t using some AVR specific features like the built-in EEPROM that the RP2040 doesn’t have.
- infinitesunrise@slrpnk.netEnglish6 months
the Arduino IDE in C++
That’s actually pretty cool, but aren’t the majority of Arduino projects written in Arduino (Java superset)? At least all of mine are, as that is how I was originally taught to program it.
edit - Please don’t downvote people for seeking information. There was nothing disingenuous or underhanded about my comment, you’re either downvoting because you dislike people asking questions or don’t like something personal about my experience, which harms this community directly and also make the site feel unnecessarily hostile. This isn’t reddit.
- 6 months
TL;DR: The Arduino language is C++ with an automatically included library, but it’s descended from a Java project with an automatically included library.
Processing is a graphics and art based graphics library/IDE that uses the Java programming language. It basically includes some classes and methods by default on top of Java that makes programming graphics and even simple games a bit more straightforward.
Processing’s IDE was forked by the Wiring project for the purposes of microcontroller hardware programming. Because the Java Virtual Machine is a bit much to ask a 16MHz 8-bit AVR to run, they switched the language to C++ which compiles straight to machine code that runs on the bare metal. Again, it’s just C++ with a library included, under the hood it uses gcc to compile and avrdude to program the chip. I believe the IDE itself is still written in Java.
Arduino took Wiring and painted it teal. They’ve extended it quite a bit since then but in the early days Arduino was really a hardware project. They’ve since added support for non-AVR boards to the Arduino IDE, including ARM-Cortex and ESP32 based boards.
Raspberry Pi offers C and C++ SDKs and a MicroPython interpreter for the Pico series. Someone contributed support for RP2040 based boards to the Arduino IDE; I don’t believe that was done officially by either RPi or Arduino.
- infinitesunrise@slrpnk.netEnglish6 months
TIL that Processing actually predates Arduino. All these years I thought that it was the other way around and that Processing was a fork of Arduino. Thanks for the history lesson!
- 6 months
If you buy one of the knock-offs, will the terms still apply? Cause I think I’m seeing an out here.
- monkeyman512@lemmy.worldEnglish6 months
I remember watching a video where they talked about the changes. Apparently most of the language people are really upset about applies specificly to their website and forums. I can’t find the video, probably because I am sick and have barely slept in the last 4 days. I miss sleep … and not coughing.
Edit: changed “can” to “can’t”
- 6 months
I hope that you get over it soon. Coughing is the worst. I’d rather have hallucination levels of fever than have a bad cough.
- monkeyman512@lemmy.worldEnglish6 months
Thanks! I actually managed 4-5 hours of sleep with minimal coughing last night. Things are trending the right direction.
