Wrapper

MisterCurtis@lemmy.world · 9 months

There are so many more options.

.container
.wrapper
.inner-wrapper
.outer-wrapper
.rapper
.notorious-big
.2pac

MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca · 9 months

.wrappyMcWrap

Edit: dammit I’m hungry now

Sundray@lemmus.org · 9 months

Hold up, those names are much too descriptive.

LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 9 months

div.w

div.w2

squirrel@discuss.tchncs.de · 9 months

<div>
  <div>
    <div></div>
  </div>
</div>

div {}
div div {}
div div div {}

peoplebeproblems@midwest.social · 9 months

Wait, that last one. It’s a syntax I don’t recognize. What is this slightly less nonsensical design?

Demdaru@lemmy.world · 9 months

Isn’t this simply CSS?

peoplebeproblems@midwest.social · 9 months

Yep. You’re right.

I couldn’t possibly think anyone would do that with CSS which is why it caught me off guard.

rooroo@feddit.org · 9 months

It’s divy mc divface

Sundray@lemmus.org · 9 months

Perfect! 👩‍🍳 💋

Alexstarfire@lemmy.world · 9 months

Our organization has perfected file naming. When something doesn’t belong in a specific area, it goes into the file named Misc. When that got too big, Misc2 was created.

almost1337@lemmy.zip · 9 months

/home/pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 9 months

almost1337@lemmy.zip · 9 months

Context

MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip · 9 months

I have this in one of my global userstyles:

#page, #Body, .Item /* please stay away from web dev */

And then there are things like <div class="h1" (and actual h1) with background-color (well, some p and a too). A text element needs no background-color, that’s a container-element thing.

Björn@swg-empire.de · 7 months

We have the semantic web now! Be better!

<section class="wrapper">
  <section class="wrapper2">