I suggest reading the first paragraph, it addresses your point.

How the hell did he arrive at the conclusion there was some sort of one-drop rule for non-protected works.

Just because the registration is blocked if you don’t specify which part is the result of human creativity, doesn’t mean the copyright on the part that is the result of human creativity is forfeit.

Copyright exists even before registration, registration just makes it easier to enforce. And nobody says you can’t just properly refile for registration of the part that is the result of human creativity.

No idea, since I have no way of knowing how the second hand market around you looks like. I just looked for a similar (in performance) card, not of the newest gen so there would hopefully be some used models around.

You’re re-opening the microkernel vs monlithic kernel debate with that. For fun you can read how Andrew S. Tanenbaum and Linus Torvalds debated the question in 1992 here: https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os.minix/c/wlhw16QWltI

Maybe the RX 7600 XT.

It’s in the second to latest generation (7000 not 9000), should be slightly faster than a GTX 1080, and doubles the VRAM capacity to 16 GB so you wouldn’t be in danger of running into limitations with that too soon.

Two that I run for our little group outside the ones you mention are Space Engineers and Valheim

Edit: Space Engineers is a little annoying though, you either have to use some emulated / translated setup, (I think I saw some being cobbled together by others), or you have to run a Windows Server VM.

But it does say right on that page:

Take note that the network request logger in uBO is a forward-looking logger: this means only future requests can be logged.

In the spirit of efficiency, uBO will log entries IF AND ONLY IF the logger is opened. Otherwise, if the logger is not opened, no CPU/memory resources are consumed by uBO for logging purpose.

Oh I remember. There are tons of events and associated handlers. Even just switching to landscape view stops and restarts an android view I think. Friends at uni handled that problem by disallowing landscape view instead of handling it hahah

I thought “the one that got away” means “the crush you never got together with”?

Oh nice those 40 bit addresses, just what we needed to spice up our IPv4 and IPv6 dual stack world

With the short variable you probably also get shadowing. That’s super fun in a new code base.

Or another favourite of mine: The first time I had to edit a perl script at work someone had used a scalar and a hash with the same name. Took me a while to realize that scalars, arrays, and hashes have separate namespaces, and the two things with seemingly the same name were unrelated.

Yeah the CIXP building in CERN has his original paper printed as a poster hanging in the doorway :-)

Oh! Okay, that’s interesting to me! What was the input language? I imagine it might be a little more doable if it’s closer to hardware?

I don’t remember that well, but I think the object oriented stuff with dynamic dispatch was hard to deal with.

That would depend on the network environment. If your VM is on a /28 subnet and you set /24 it won’t be valid

that’s just how they are made.

Can confirm, even the little training compiler we made at Uni for a subset of Java (Javali) had a backend and frontend.

I can’t imagine trying to spit out machine code while parsing the input without an intermediary AST stage. It was complicated enough with the proper split.

And Eiffel is in a different plane of existence entirely

The original goes to 1024 x 786 and has different zoom levels. I’ve played most of the original parks this year and that does not see to be too high res to me. Give me a sec I’ll take a screenshot of mine in a minute.

Edit here it is. It’s the GOG version, which launches fullscreen, so the 1024 x 768 are stretched onto the center of my 1920 x 1080 screen.

As @shane@feddit.nl says, you can use the same public port for many different destination address, vendors may call it something like “port overloading”.

I just responded to him on that point, while you were typing to me. I didn’t know this existed, thanks for pointing it out!

More importantly, you can install a large pool of public address on your CGNAT. For instance if you install a /20 pool, work with a 100 users / public address multiplexing, you can have 400,000 users on that CGNAT. 100 users / address is a comfortable ratio that will not affect most users. 1000 users / address would be pushing it, but I’m sure some ISP will try it.

Sure, yeah, I have seen a few threads on NANOG about the NAT address ratios people are using. I also think I remember someone saying he was forced to use 1000 and it kind of worked as long as he pulled the heaviest users out of the pool. But if I recall correctly he was also saying he made IPv6 available in parallel to reduce the CGNAT load.

But the point that made this post ridiculous and an obvious joke is that it said “one address” :-)

A TCP session is a unique combination of client IP, client port, server IP, and server port. So you can use the same IP and port as long as the destination is a different IP or port.

Fair point! I wasn’t aware of any NAT working that way, but they could exist, I agree. It does blow up the session table a bit, but we are taking about a hell of a large theoretical system here anyway, so it’s not impossible.

This wouldn’t help going to popular destinations, since they have a lot of people going to the same IP address and port, but for many (most?) of them you probably have some sort of CDN servers in your data centers anyway.

Actually we have recently seen a few content providers not upgrading their cache servers and instead preferring to fall back to our PNIs (which to be fair are plenty fast and have good enough latencies). On the other hand others made new ones available recently. Seems there isn’t a universal best strategy the industry is converging on at the moment.

Funny how many here took this to be real, judging from the reactions. To me it’s an obvious joke.

Question to you guys: How do you suppose 200 million customers will share the less than 65’536 ports that are available on that one address?