By this logic, you want a complete monopoly of a single platform? Because that’s the only possible way to have “no barrier”. Unless GitHub starts federating with some kind of standardized protocol. This is a huge technological and monetary barrier for GitHub, which is why it will never happen on its own, so if users are not willing to try platform-independent workflows then the problem is frankly not the competing platforms.
Unicorn 🌳
- 0 posts
- 6 comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: June 12th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
- Unicorn 🌳@mander.xyztoProgramming@programming.dev•is it just me or GitHub is turning into some sort of LinkedIn3 years
- Unicorn 🌳@mander.xyztoProgramming@programming.dev•is it just me or GitHub is turning into some sort of LinkedIn3 years
This is only true for the merge request workflow and not at all a problem for the patch workflow, which can work entirely via email (and is in my eyes simpler). Have a look at https://git-send-email.io/ if you want to learn about it. This is the true decentralized spirit of git. :)
- Unicorn 🌳@mander.xyztoProgramming@programming.dev•is it just me or GitHub is turning into some sort of LinkedIn3 years
There are many good replacements, you just need to stop using Github :)
Some examples: Forgejo/Gitea (self-host or hosted eg. codeberg.de), Gitlab (self-host or hosted), Sourcehut (self-host or hosted eg. sr.ht)
Why not go even further? Just switch off the pesky computer entirely. No noise, not even coil whine.
That is answered in the original post, the author is just doing this for fun and learning. :)
Have to agree, it’s a funny story but charging someone a stupidity rate for nonexistent work isn’t justified by that person being stupid and a pain in your ass. Unless your circumstances force you, you can always just refuse work from customers like this. So many people downvoting this is disappointing.