[deleted]

That’s gonna be a no for me dawg.

I blame the AI bubble memory shortage for making this over $1,000 USD.

Experience leads to the technical equivalent of ‘measure twice, cut once’.

Who needs external malicious actors when you jam AI into your workflow?

These are weaponized ads.

The sneaky traffic cone is cracking me up.

Mine is wired for a bit when the batteries need charging.

Because he is a synth!

wheauxeauxsh

“Omlette du frommage.”

Generally simulated fabrics look good as long as it is flapping in the wind like a flag and has no chance of interacting with any other objects, such as the person wearing a scarf.

Could the line be quality of life for everyone?

Congratulations!

RAID0 has no redundancy, but all of the other RAID options do have redundancy.

Third expectation is a dealbreaker!

Assumes that the bulb can be touched, that it is hot when turned on, and that the position of the switch for ‘on’ is the standard position.

“There is no need to be malicious when incompetence will provide the same result” - ChatGPT

No it doesn’t.

Corrupt people are taught to be corrupt, whether intentionally or by example. Like having a terrible parent who teaches them that selfishness and taking everything is how they should behave.

But once someone has chosen that path they tend to look for opportunities, and that includes positions of power. They can change, sure, but people who have been corrupt for decades are very unlikely to change especially if they have benefitted from corruption.

Banned is the wrong word.

Steam chose not to distribute it because it they understood an early build to include children in sexual situations. Further builds did not dissuade them from the original decision.

Epic, who originally was going to distribute based on the developer filling out some form chose not to after filling it out themselves and finding it had a higher rating (adult only) at the last minute.

The developer speculated it was about a specific scene, but based on both steam and epic there are fundamental concerns about the content that led to no distributing on their platforms, which is not banning, that do not align with the story the developers are presenting. It is not likely to be about one scene that was in an earlier build that was the issue for them.

The important thing is that the game is not BANNED in any way whatsoever. It is available on fewer distribution platforms, which reduces visibility, but is not banning any more than exclusive deals or limited releases are banning on other platforms.

Personally I get the impression that the developers see the content very differently than steam and epic because the developers focus on intent and steam and epic focus on what actually exists in the game.

Plus if it doesn’t compile then you have junk in the trunk.

I think corrupt people being attracted to positions of power is far more common than a decent person being corrupted.