• 0 posts
  • 41 comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: July 1st, 2023
  • Today I made a widget on my phone that logs the tracks I play and drums via BT in the ekit. Once the session done it pushes the txt file to my PC while I eject the SD card with the drum recordings in it and plug it into the PC. I then run a session script that pairs the drum tracks to the music track log, clears the SD, and catalogues everything in my production folder, while also building an MD in my Obsidian vault that outlines all the audio and lets me write notes on each or about how the session went. The file structure is obv Reaper friendly for when I want to multi track everything back together.

    This took almost all day. Because writing down what track I was listening to when I saved a recording has just been so much effort up until now /s.

    I’m sure it’ll pay the time deficit back over a decade.

  • We’ll be in this state until actually intelligent AI comes along. Some evolution of machine learning beyond LLMs.

    Yep. The methodology of LLMs is effectively an evolution of Markov chains. If someone hadn’t recently change the definition of AI to include “the illusion of intelligence” we wouldn’t be calling this AI. It’s just algorithmic with a few extra steps to try keep the algorithm on-topic.

    These types.of things, we have all the time in generative algorithms. I think LLMs being more publicly seen is why someone started calling it AI now.

    So we’ve basically hit the ceiling straight out of the gate and progress is not quicker or slower. We’ll have another step forward in predictive algorithms in the future, but not now. It’s usually a once a decade thing and varies in advancement.

    Edit: I have to point out that I initially had hope that this current iteration of “genAI” would be a very useful tool in advancing us to actual AI faster, but, no. It seems the issues of “hallucination”—which are a built-in unavoidable issue with predictive algorithms trained on unfiltered mass—is not very capable. The university I work at, we’ve been trying different things for the past two years, and so far there seems to be no hope. However, genAI is good at summarising mass outputs of our normal AI, which can produce a lot to comb through, but anything the genAI interpretats still needs double-checked despite closed off training.

    It’s been unsurprisingly disappointing.

    We’re still at a point where logic is done with the same old method of mass iterations. Training is slow and complex. genAI relies on being taught logic that already exists, not being able to thoroughly learn it’s own. There is no logic in predictive algorithms outside of the algorithm itself, and they’re very logically closed and defined.

  • SQL enjoyer?

    Every time I use it I feels like I’m going back to the 90s. No variables, no functions; Oh but you can do a CTE or subquery…👍

    UNION ALL, UNION ALL, UNION ALL… “There’s got to be a better way, surely…”

    looks up better way

    “Oh, what the fuck?!.. Nope, this will just be quicker…” UNION ALL, UNION ALL, UNION ALL…

    Join in a table sharing column names… Everything breaks. You gotta put the new prefixes in front of all the headers you called in now. In every select, in every where, etc… Which is weird because that kinda works like a variable and it’s fine…

    “When you see this little piece of text, it means all this, got it?”

    “Okay. Yep. Easy.”

    “So why can’t you do that with expressions?”

    SQL SCREAMS MANICALLY

    “Okay, okay, okay!.. Jesus…”

    And then you try put a MAX in a where and it won’t let you because you gotta pull all the maxes out in their own query, make a table, join them in, and use them like a filter…

    I hate it. It has speed, when you can finally run the script, but everything up to that is so…ugh.

  • Friend’s colleague needed Excel to, “return the month where the majority of days in the week fall into”. Had Copilot do it and sent it to my friend, apparently impressed by making such a robust looking formula.

    The formula:

    My friend’s solution a minute later:

    I can see it could be slimmed even less, but I assume the table is large so LET is doing performance stuff.

  • …why would a professional whatever make a remark for technology doing their job for them and making their career redundant?

    Farmer, coder, driver, whatever. “I can’t wait for the bots to do this” is not a common muttering. Except maybe if in the c-suite…

  • This is another fine example of where assumptions get you no where on the internet. My job isn’t coding but it requires knowing to do it well. If I exit the job market, as per your request, I cannot be replaced by a coder. Believe it or not, most jobs that require a coding skillset are not about coding. Crazy, right? 😲

  • I have the confidence level turned down too but lately it doubles down on itself.

    The usual conversation…

    VI: “You could do this.”
    Me: “That won’t work because XYZ.”
    VI: “No, you can definitely do that. XYZ has nothing to do with it.”
    Me: pastes it’s own suggestion in.
    VI: “Almost, but that won’t work because of XYZ.”

    It’s most notorious one is adding an s to Table.AddColumn() then proceeding to make a full snippet around this newly made up function. This specific example is so regular it’s become a joke at work for giving someone an unhelp response,

    “What do you want to do for lunch today?”

    “Have you tried table add columns?”