Oh how I hated it when I experienced the snap shenanigan firsthand.

find . -iname “searchword”

No matter how many words you write, using a leaked password doesn’t make anyone a hacker. You clearly have no concept of hacking. Btw: there is no felony in German law related to unauthorized entry into a house on it’s own. All criminal relevance is gained from other intents.

Then I am sure you wouldn’t mind quoting me “the law” from Germany, by which entering someone else’s house with a key they lost on the street is considered “breaking in”, would you? Btw - don’t bother: you are arguing a strawman that I used as an example anyways, it’s still not “hacking” if you use a password that you found somewhere. Now stop distracting from the administration in the divided states of middle northern america protecting child rapists including their head of state.

“the law” you say? In which country, huh? There’s more than one in the world, you know?

No, that’s just the definition that dumb fucks use to justify punishing people for their own stupidity. Unauthorized access and whatever you do with it is completely independent from HOW you gain access. And using legitimate credentials is not hacking. Obtaining the credentials may be done by hacking, but if they are just negligently tossed into the world, it’s not.

Same as losing your house keys and having someone use them to enter your house is unauthorized entry and violation of a set of laws, but it is NOT breaking into a house.

You are arguing against a strawman. Never have I said in this whole thread debuggers were useless. I made a point to say they are absolutely not essential, and for multithreading issues they can be detrimental.

Not OC but: I won’t always read an article when the post title is a perfectly valid question. Software can be “done”, but typically the environment in which it runs evolves, so at some point a patch might be needed.

İmportant distinction: TeX is considered “perfect software” IIRC while LaTeX has evolved over time (or was still evolving when I last used it in the 2000s)

Saying it is not essential and saying it is generally useless are two very different things.

Most concurrency problems disappear at the pace of a debugger.

And I believe you are very wrong in that belief. However, a reliable statistic is not the first search result that I can find, so we’ll have to disregard the disagreement on that point. You lost me at your C# multithreading reasoning though. A debugger will always interfere with the processes you are looking at, hence making debugging of multithreading-related errors a game of whack-a-mole.

The only people who would take you being “more correct” from any of this are those who don’t know much about SW development. In internet lingo, what you wrote in your OC is called ragebait.

“it depends” is something I can agree on.

Okay I will concede your point. :) You do have bad hair g

You clearly haven’t done much backend or middleware development.

That is the beauty of it: no one forces you to do so.

I think you are not looking at the full picture - there are developments (arguably everything back-end) where a debugging system is absolutely not essential and in many cases (multithreading) outright useless for some types of bugs.

I have never seen or known a serious professional

I think your message ended there, you accidentally copypasted some garbage after that statement.

That is a moronic take. You would be better off learning to structure your approach to SW development than trying to learn how to use a glorified slop machine to plagiarize other people’s works.