
someone else:
theoretically, it is!
–sincerely, someone else.

someone else:
theoretically, it is!
–sincerely, someone else.

reproduce everything real, living neurons do.
is not a strict requirement for intelligence.
it’s also an extreme misrepresentation to say it approximates actual neurons.
well you’re in luck, because i have seen a website counter to your claim!
Thread: Circuits

“intelligence” is not a very narrow term! imagenet classifiers are definitely intelligent in some way.

instead of llm, slm! (small language model)

tried baking making your own ai, like, as a joke? you’ll know how bad “getting training data” is

neural networks (“ai”) are really cool, and if i get around to messing around with one it probably would be fun. the problem is not the neural network itself, but every. single. thing. other than it

in scheme, everything* is first class!
*i haven’t checked

you could make a program that verifies that the code matches the proof and that the proof is sound, but then you have to verify the program, and verify the verification, and verify your system of logic is consistent, which by gödel’s incompleteness theorem is impossible(?)

removed familiars
:(

“ransomware can’t be decrypted” implies the ransomware itself can’t be decrypted, ugh

https://stallmansupport.org/
we should all know this by now
i’ll forgejo mama!!!

idk. still doing it though.

joking about protogens being made of computer? and therefore completely different?

hardware is like your computer, stuff like the cpu and ram. software is like the programs on that computer. linus torvalds makes a program that has to deal with the details of the computer (the linux kernel). as such, they have to work around problems in the hardware.

eww put an nsfw tag on that

use a third party client!
c, can i have a object oriented programming
c: no, we have object oriented programming at home.
object oriented programming at home: struct
(??)