• 0 posts
  • 73 comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: November 12th, 2023
  • this is the classic answer but it also fails pure logic because the question only implies one of them actually works, and even then, it’s only one of them. the truth is any number of them could work, or a specific combination, or a number of combinations, or it might be none. the bulb itself to could be busted. my point is not to be an uncooperative asshole but that a logic puzzle that relies on real world properties should cover its bases.

  • i think they either agree that he was culpable or they used the assumption that you would find him culpable as an argument that inciting violence does make one guilty to some degree.

    the problem is there isn’t really any evidence that the left called for his head (especially a head that big; even the shooter knew he couldn’t penetrate that dome with mere bullets), and certainly not anyone of significance… while the jan6 was incited by the most powerful person in the world.

  • i wrote an incredible program in assembly once, and even i was surprised how well it was running because i don’t know how to code at all. then i woke up and realized it was a dream. should’ve known when I named it phant