Not true. The current layout is the result of years of evolution based on feedback by typists and vendors.
I’m paranoid so I have created a physically separate network for the IoT stuff. Everything gets its IP from the same server from a /25. The lower is the trusted network, high IPs are not. IoT network devices cannot open connections to the other network. A bit awkward, but works fine.
I don’t see how VLANs would help OP.
That BF game, where the tutorial instructions were given in broken english by some manager from the company making the game. Pure cringe.
I agree, people come here to learn. Don’t gatekeep information.
The first sentence is not really true though.
Like every other Fowler article?
time to do some perf profiling
Connect using 2.4GHz, create own network with the 5GHz antenna?
Yeah, but it’s a proposal, so not really better that .lan.
There’s a draft rfc that defines “.home.arpa” as an internal. It looks stupid and totally misses the point, but works.
AFAIK it’s a planned feature for Forgejo
In theory 🤡
A multitude of things are far easier to do on Kubernetes. If you combine it with an immutable OS, then less effort too.
People can see what domains you use with TLS, but that could be OK: https://letsencrypt.org/docs/ct-logs/
Their knowledge stops at creating sway screenshots.