I wouldn’t necessarily say it “tells us something about reality”, as the expression goes, but it is useful in describing reality. Like the last statement of waves, which was supposed to be an spaced out exageration, is how much of physics is built. You look at something and wonder how to describe it. Sometimes it make sense to start with a single pulse, wave, or oscillator, which does not solve it completely and so you add more perturbations to it. You do this sort of stuff basically everywhere in physics. Everywhere else, some other correspondence usually appear. In computer science you use hard problems to design cryptos, physics gets stuck at the same problems. String theory uses algebraic geometry and end up with models where the areas they cannot solve is where elliptic curve crypos come from.

What kind of issues would one observe from this bug?

I have serious issues with Cosmic. When I lock the screen and come back, then it has kills all terminals except the Cosmic terminal, firefox has become… broken, for the lack of a better word, where all new pages just give gray background color and no menu items work, and the sound is reset to the laptop speaker instead of hdmi, not the disolay though, only sound. Then fullscreening terminals also makes them crash, as in they seem to refuse to take input.

It is not really usable. But since nvidia on x11 in popos started resetting the display config when the screen went to sleep, it beats the alternative.

I found this

This manuscript was developed in dialogue with several artificial intelligence system

I guess that is why you say

With this project having escaped my competence long ago

OK. Just to let you know, nothing here makes sense.

Tanke my question. Like on some level, “$g_{rr}$” is the correct answer. But not in the context of the text in the manuscript. Then the answer would be “there is no spatial curvature in that metric, that statement and the section is wrong”.

Your suggested improvements at the end of the comment would not help the situation either. None of them relevantly addresses the issue.

Your answer here makes no sense. For the gravitational lensing calculation you use one metric. Here you try to juggle three metrics at once to… I’m not sure what the intent is, but there are barely anything that makes sense.

Look. If you think that anything here make sense, that you believe that anything that these LLMs your are using is getting closer to some new description of reality, or are even coherent, then I advise you to talk to someone. Like a health professional. What you are doing is not healthy. I’m saying this out of genuine consern.

I will not engage you on this anymore. Just one last thing before I leave, you are not to mention my user name in any contribution nor acknowledgment. Nothing I have said is to be taken as a positive encuragement as to indicate that you are making anything useful here. Hence it would not make sense to make a reference to this conversation as any sort of contribution, as it is not an attempt at contributing but only to critique. So please, do not attribute this to some “community contribution” in any of your texts.

May not be completely on topic… but in your manuscript there you appear to make physics claims. What are those actually? Like you appear to claim to resolve black hole singularities, but there is no substance in the article. Before solving unsolved problem, your theory must reproduce old results, in some way.

An example of common GR exercises you should be able to reproduce is like the gravitational bending of light. Good, you have a chapter on that. However, it contains several errors and appears not to contain references to the claims or derivation of them from your “theory”. Like here is the simplest, first GR lecture stuff, on that section, you write:

The factor of 4 (twice the Newtonian value) comes from the equal contribution of the temporal and spatial curvature in the metric

Can you point to the spatial curvature part of that metric you show there? The one you say contribute an equal factor to the light bending angle.

Then I’d have a lot of follow ups, but it would be helpful to spell out that in this section on light bending is derived from your priciples and what are just suppose to be GR statements.

I find it very useful, and it conflicts with normal copy paste very rarely. There are two clipboards, one is filled with latest highlighted, and the other with latest Ctrl+C:ed. Middle click pastes from the first, Ctrl+V from the second. This makes you able to copy two things at once: ctrl+c something first, highlight something else second, paste in any order. The confusing thing when learing to use it for me was that since I need to highlight to ctrl+c, I will overwrite what is in the middle click clipboard, and it also means you cannot highlight something to replace it with whats in your middle click clipboard. It does however mean that most times you want to do a ctrl+c/ctrl+v both clipboards are in sync. Not sure why, but I often find myself having to copy/paste two things at once, and I use both buffers without thinking. Which makes it impossible to use macos.

“Other Unix-like”, do they mean like open/free/netBSD and that class? Because macos does not have that, right? Only some terminals emulate that behaviour by overwriting the normal clipboard, making it very hard to switch between them.

TL;DR: yes

Just from a quick view of the repo, the simplest way to do it would be to look at the playbook.yml and copy all roles you want for a host into a new playbook, say myhost.yaml. Copy not only the roles but all the other keywords as well. Then you go to the inventory and add your hosts where you to execute the playbook against. Then you change the hosts key value in the playbook you made from all to the hosts you added to the inventory.

That is, add your hosts to the inventory, create playbooks for for them and run. That is the easiest. Read up on how to do groups and organizing your inventory to improve it from there.

I got mine from https://serverpartdeals.com/ that was before Trump 2.0, but it appears prices to EU are still ok. Shipping was brilliant. They appear to have 14TB for about 180 USD.

Maybe that makes more sense. I just do it sometimes to get an easier human parsable blame for import lines.

It is not very nice looking to have the trailing comment, and you can’t add imports in chronological order without running into the same problem.

Hm, I should have asked… When I had a similar problem I just unplugged disk by disk from my raidz2 to find the right one. Good that you found a better way.

I would recommend this too. This was the easiest to setup. I only had an issue with docker compose which made the pihole not being accessible while on wireguard. Once I put the pihole and wg-easy on the same docker network it started working.

I got one of those too. I called the customer service to get another path home because of disturbances, and they just have robot answering. The robot started halfway through the call just reading pure json at me, and then said “to get this information as a message press 1” or something. This is what I got:

Here is your journey from undefined to undefined: BUSS 506 towards Karolinska sjukhuset 09:36 from undefined 10:18 arrived at undefined. Link to your journey.

I tripped over a cord once and broke the screen on my laptop. I salvaged the disk for another purpuse. But I got some prime hardware here, it’s got video output, it’s got ram, and a cpu! I used it for my lectures; liveusb with some persistent storage on, put my slides on there and fire it up. Did not have to unplug the normal laptop from my office. Nothing magic really, but some students were puzzled.

It does spell trouble, but you might be able to ask your ISP to give you a public IP in that case.

There is no auth needed for gh runners? Like a secret shared between them and the repo? I would guess repo secrets are not shared when forked… right?

Not sure what Disk Manager is, but if it says

USB Mass Storage device detected

It appears to be something. If you do a sudo journalctl -f before you plug it in, does it tell you what device name it is given? If it is sata-to-usb you are using it is probably /dev/sd[a-z] or so, does anyone show up when you plug it in?

I recently got some Toshibas and they were loud. They also presented with a seek error pre-fail after a few days (all three of them). That propably adds to the volume, but the seagate and wds I switched to just have some clicking noises. Not too bad.

Oh, it is part of the Tor project even. Cool. Thanks. I will read the links.