Interesting! I’ve seen the sidebar but not thought of much advantage from it. I’ll take another look. Model/provider change is a breeze, I just assumed Claude would do the same but maybe they want to make it harder to leave their models? Workspaces? Sounds interesting - gotta check it out.

I just discovered how easy it is to view/switch sessions in opencode.

I use opencode, have seen Claude but never used it. What are some examples of things opencode does that Claude doesn’t?

Ah.

I don’t care if AI was used in its creation. I do care if it’s FOSS/libre.

And also, it’s a bit weird to me that copying YouTube’s UI is considered good. I havent used YouTube in a long time, but I recall there being some good aspects and some bad. Why not create your own vesion of a UI?

I agree that more options is a good thing, and that activitypub would be a plus. But FYI, I wont be using it because of the license. I use only FOSS whenevr possible.

Server01: 64 Server02: 19 Plus a bunch of sidecar containers solely for configs that aren’t running.

Thanks for explaining. 🙂

I’d assume that many services were created to send an activation link via email and don’t know how to talk to a Matrix server. In those cases, do they email their activation link to a service or proxy that then communicates it to the appropriate matrix server/account/room?

Not positive, but I think you left in a reference to real info (twilightparadox.com) instead of “example-fying” it (mydomain.com), in the paragraph just before section 4:

For example say I have home-assistant running on a Pi with the local address 192.168.0.11, I could create a subdomain named ha that has the value mysub.twilightparadox.com then create the following nginx config

server{
	listen 80;
	server_name ha.mydomain.com;
	resolver 192.168.0.1;
	location / {
		proxy_pass http://192.168.0.11/;
	}
}

When nginx sees a request for ha.mydomain.com it passes it to the address 192.168.0.11 port 80.

I self-host a CA server with [step-ca](https://github.com/smallstep/certificates], and I also use it to create my mTLS certs.

I agree, but my point was that the source ia available to see and assess, which is important to me and why i am using Immich.

I used to use photostructure. I like its appearance and feature set (and the developer is a super nice guy), and really like how it leaves my asset files alone but works with sidecars, but i stopped using it because I only use open source software now.

I currently use Immich* and really like its appearance, features, self-hostability, but dislike how it manages the asset files. Even if i add my assets as an external library, which immich will theoretically not manipulate, the immich apps on iOS and Android will only upload images to a sifferent library that Immich manipulates. I’d have to ignore Immich’s upload feature and roll my own, which is annoying.

*I realize Futo’s license is not really FOSS. Disapppointing, but at least not peopeietary and secret.

If you’re wanting to share all files, many of the methods already mentioned work well. If you’re wanting to share specific files, CopyParty is a good way to go.

Sounds like a nice idea, looks nice. I’ll check it out in more depth soon. Thanka for sharing.

FYI, i don’t see a license on your repo.

Update June 2024: this issue is no longer updated. Progress on federation can be followed from:

• The monthly reports
• Issues and pull requests tagged with forgejo/federation
• The dedicated federation repository which includes a roadmap

Sounds like you already know what you need to know to host Ollama in a Docker container. Ollama is an LLM “engine” - you can interact with LLM models via a CLI or you can integrate them into other services via an API.

To have a web page chat like ChatGPT or others, I installed OpenWebU. I love it! A friend of mine likes LMStudio, which i think is a desktop app, but I don’t know anything about it.

I really enjoy tt-rss. I self host it so i guess I’ll keep using it until i find a replacement, but this is sad.

This project is licensed under the Open WebUI License, a revised BSD-3-Clause license. You receive all the same rights as the classic BSD-3 license: you can use, modify, and distribute the software, including in proprietary and commercial products, with minimal restrictions. The only additional requirement is to preserve the “Open WebUI” branding, as detailed in the LICENSE file. For full terms, see the LICENSE document.

The license seems to me to say that you can use, modify, redistribute Open-WebUI as you want, but you can’t change the branding unless your instance has <= 50 users (or a couple other conditions are met).