What language is that so I can avoid it.
- 0 posts
- 25 comments
- mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.orgto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev•What's stopping you from writing your Rust like this?
1 yearThis is why python has to be putdown
Let’s play coin flip!
I really hope so but they first need a language specification. Without that it’s no use for me.
C++26: remove C++
- mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.orgto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev•It's official, Rust is an anti C/C++ elitist slur
2 yearsI want to use Rust, but it lacks an Specification. Until that is done it’s a no go.
Literally me every time I want to program something slightly complex in Python.
- mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.orgto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev•Quantum Lock suspends sales due to developers losing access to source code
2 yearsThat sounds hella painful
He is making the job worse for his team not his corporation. That’s not the way to deal with that.
I hate this kind of practice. It shows no empathy for the guy that will have to fix it.
- mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.orgto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev•Quantum Lock suspends sales due to developers losing access to source code
2 yearsSo they were developing the game by sharing zips of their versions? OMG. There should be a tutorial of minimum Dev knowledge for wanna be new developers. They have very cool ideas, but the way they program…
For example Shadows of Doubt. Was running super bad last time I checked out. I think that too much accessibility to game Dev tools is lowering the quality of a lot of games (in resource hungry sense).
What’s wrong with having a some year old software? Does it do what you need? Yes. Then what? I have all I need on Debian. Why should I care of new updates. Security? Yes we have Debian security because of that. Look, y’all had the xyz backdoor package in your systems because it was new. Me as a Debian stable user I didn’t have to deal with it. Did I lose something by not having the latests software? No. Well maybe less crashes.
Most privative software also gets weekly updates. Does it make it better? No. You may prefer that.
Also I don’t get the point about the version numbering of Debian packages. Every team uses the versioning they want.
From my experience software that updates a lot tends to break old features a lot too.
Debian suporting freesoftware projects or other stuff doesn’t look as a relevant argument. I mean if you prefer using privative stuff and using that kind of software. Do whatever you like with your Google/Facebook/Apple friends.
But don’t come intoxicate the community with this bullshit.
You can always adapt to your how repo. But yeah, that’s the point. If you can trust people to make changes on a repo then you should be able to trust them in using some kind of commit structure.
Generic names are probably used in order to crate a familiar, easy to remember, structurized commit format.
You can always water it down. The point is to have some order in the commits. Otherwise is just messy.
Please use Conventional Commits. Simple and easy to use. Plus it is very easy so combine with Versioning techniques like Semantic Versioning.
- 2 years
Nice, my lovely C syntax. Thank you!
- 2 years
How? For real I hate python not having ; and { and depending on tabs and spaces (PAIN)
- 2 years
Holy shit people are toxic. The poor guy that responded.

Can i login with your mom?