i can count on one hand how many times ive had white space issues in 15 years of using python. its just not an issue

tooling would have to do it all after the fact or something

Also corruption where the person choosing to pay Oracle also is an owner of Oracle.

It’s a path but, also its always been like that. Also there is a supermarket with the same idea, HEB center market.

That’s why I use webcrwaler

Galactic center is the frame to use for any space travel.

UTC doesn’t become wrong, you can either just accept a different pace of the clock, i.e. earth ppl will be ever so late to a meeting or it’s just a different kind of timezone conversion. Better would be to have a single time based on the reference frame of the center of the galaxy and everyone keep there time relative to that.

Yes

Yes, that’s part of the point. Dumping all at once into a merge and asking people to comprehend it all isn’t particularly realistic.

The right click menu has an entry to search what is highlighted with the default search engine next to an entry to search with bing.

They don’t exist

What kind of application is it?

Blobs of json are your friend.

A closed blockchain doesn’t need or use expensive hashing nor is expensive hashing required for a public blockchain.

Every rant about how blockchains are bad SQL databases is ignorant of the actual, novel uses of a decentralized blockchain and whatever system it uses as proof to find the current block’s validator.

Blockchains allow for the synchronization of many actors up to the agreement of the majority of actors. They eliminate a class of corruption. Which is at least those where the authority over a log of data uses that authority to alter the log outside the will of the majority of those who use said log.

You can make all the arguments you want about the usefulness of that ability, you can make arguments that the cost of adding that ability being too high vs the reward.

You vague argued that its complicated and it wont end banks so its pointless. Neither of which is much of an argument. Also, the blockchain replaces central banks, not member banks.

Is that worth doing? Likely not at the current state of the technology.

Blockchain gives a protocol that allows new data sources to join and leave without any coordination while also ensuring data consistency in the data added up to the will of the majority of validators. If, for example, the validators are people, the data sources are doctors and hospitals, and the data is medical history. You can have all your medical history collected together and only accessible to you.

I think you are saying the same thing, but it’s less that history can’t be changed and more than all changes are collectively acknowledged. The Brazilian vaccine record shows why that can be a highly desirable attribute; it prevents a class of corruption while also automating the tasks that could have been corrupted.

In a blockchain, the government is the majority of nodes. That’s who can revert fraudulent transactions. Ethereum already did this once.

Agreed, extraordinary tools.

Companies have only one goal, more profit. Both actions here work to that goal.

Broic acid the borax of ants.