Well I think that’s part of the magic, Linux should enable people to do what they want to do, even try to emulate windows.

That’s also Mark Russ on the left

Lol like facilitate versus effectuate

Dynamic types aren’t static types my man. I think you got some learning to do.

Lol you’ll get no argument from me. It’s not my favorite language.

Theoretically, Javascript is an untyped language, so there aren’t supposed to really be static types. Giving type errors in this situation would be against design.

I know this is for fun, but as general advice to the homies, if a language or system is doing something you didn’t expect, make sure to look at the documentation

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/parseInt

This will save a lot of time and headaches

Not that you aren’t entitled to your opinion, but software running on a Tesla is, in many ways just as mallaible as code on a vacuum robot.

There are several challenges, but basically the protections stopping people from reading and writing firmware would need to be defeated.

I think there have been some software jailbreaks on earlier models already that have been patched, but software is complicated, it’s hard be bug free.

Yeah that is fun, credit where it’s due, compilers do a lot of cool work behind the scenes.

I mean, the comic is fine I guess, but if it implies the Cpp lady is hitting you, it’s not. That would be the kernel, the lady did what you told her to do.

Java when you don’t put in a try catch, vs Template<typename T> in Cpp

Very informative, I think people will learn from what you’re saying, but it doesn’t really matter to what I’m saying.

Yes, absolutely, consider the human element in your data encryption and protection schemes and implementations.

Beating someone with a pipe is a joke, but not really defeating an algorithm.

I appreciate the explaination, that’s a cool scheme, but what I saying is the human leaking the key is not the fault of the algorithm.

Everyone and everything is, on a very pedantic level, weak to getting their ass beat lol

That doesn’t make it crypt analysis

Doesn’t break the algorithm though, you would just have the key and then can use the algorithm (that still works!) to decrypt data.

Also you’re talking about one class of cryptography, the concept of key knowledge varies between algorithms.

My point is an attacker having knowledge of the key is a compromise, not a successful break of the algorithm…

“the attacker beat my ass until I gave them the key”, doesn’t mean people should stop using AES or even RSA, for example.

No, really though, where’s it from?

Where is this from? I don’t think exposing the key breaks most crypto algorithms, it should still be doing its job.

Employed

Does this function like RDP? It’s one of the better products to come out of Microsoft.