I think the conflict comes from the philosophical opposition to the application being in control of such a thing. Title bars are for window management and application termination, which are beyond the purview of the application itself. GNOME decided that they wanted it to be something different and include application controls as well all on their own.
- 0 posts
- 6 comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: July 4th, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
- 9 months
What are the vulnerabilities?
The volume - weaponization levels of spew - makes a difference between an average Joe gullibly “charging” their phone in a microwave to the future of nations and their public being undermined.
- coronach@lemmy.sdf.orgto
2 yearshttps://web.archive.org/web/20160314132836/http://www.opnsense.com/
This was the website that pfsense maintainers made as soon as OPNsense was announced. They sniped the name, derided the project and only ended up handing over the domain after they were legally compelled to.
One person affiliated with Netgate in particular can be seen around forums and social media and has serious axes to grind. He’s… not pleasant.
Add to that Netgate’s practices (IIRC secret proprietary blob required to build pfsense, double-check that fact / unremovable installation tracking) and the picture painted is one of petulance and anger.
[edit] oh yeah, and this gem! https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/03/buffer-overruns-license-violations-and-bad-code-freebsd-13s-close-call/
- coronach@lemmy.sdf.orgto
Second OPNsense. pfSense also is maintained by some pretty shitty individuals.
Probably not since their GUI tools have historically been slow and buggy though the years.