Yup! Based.
Billegh
This space left intentionally blank.
- 0 posts
- 56 comments
Also, encrypt before sending. Plausible deniability is a real thing.
It’s like autism, there’s a spectrum. Perl can be very c like. It also can be indistinguishable from actual line noise. Or it can be like roku and not really look like Perl at all. Lol
There are entire categories of languages less readable than Perl…
It’s even more confusing than that; the
Xis for revision 10, and theLis for long term.It’s an update to the JPEG standard intended to cover expected future uses and capabilities.
The more the merrier!
- Billegh@lemmy.worldtoSelfhosted@lemmy.world•Those who are hosting on bare metal: What is stopping you from using Containers or VM's? What are you self hosting?English9 months
It depends on the service and the desired level of it stack.
I generally will run services directly on things like a raspberry pi because VMs and containers offer added complexity that isn’t really suitable for the task.
At work, I run services in docker in VMs because the benefits far outweigh the complexity.
But that’s only four chars in four bytes. This absolute madlad has put five chars in four bytes.
Debian becoming Arch confirmed.
Yup. Checked, unchecked, and not checked.
- Billegh@lemmy.worldtoLinux@programming.dev•Steam data reveals PC gamers shifting from Windows to Linux10 months
Honestly? The problem is the people who use desktop Linux. The environments are fine. It’s the people. Can confirm. I use Arch, btw.
That is the jankiest thing I have seen in at least ten years.
Edit: because of course it’s office.
Ah, the ol’ tristate boolean switcheroo
- Billegh@lemmy.worldtoLinux@programming.dev•WSL2 Vulnerability Could Lead To Elevating Local Privileges10 months
If only there were a way to run Linux on your device without having to worry about Microsoft’s buggy code?
If only there were a way…
- 11 months
In other news, Arch users getting what they asked for. A difficult and highly customizable Linux. 😉
- Billegh@lemmy.worldtoLinux@programming.dev•Linux users are about to face another major Microsoft Secure Boot issue11 months
Secure boot can’t fail due to expired certificates if it’s already disabled…
Why do you want to know? Huh?
Clicking on “Add” just gives a contextless “this only works on desktop” with no explanation of why or why not. About doesn’t really explain why either. Could use a more helpful message there.