I don’t see how web 1.0 style sites are resistant to AI or bots. It’s kind of the opposite. Bots/AI are really good at pure text stuff.
You might be thinking of the original OpenID system. Instead of the OAuth2 thing we have now with OIDC (e.g. “Login with Google”), OpenID Connect didn’t require the site to be configured in advance with the auth provider. You just gave it your email address and off you went.
OIDC is generally superior security-wise but it’s held back by each site to establish a relationship with the upstream site.
Old fashioned forums are old fashioned. Circular logic but there’s a lot holding them back.
The “self-clean” function might get that high. I think most ovens lock the door when you do that though.
I don’t think Postgres shouldn’t be just left as :latest or anything. At least the way I handle it, DB upgrades require manual intervention.
trunk was the common name before git anyway. Why the move away? I’ve heard it’s because git is more of a weird graph than the trunk+branch model of CVS. But if that’s the reasoning, master is still a stupid name because it implies the same primacy as trunk. Why not just default or start or something?
It’s awesome until you want to put the cursor in a specific spot of a previous command.
$ rm -f delete-me.txt
ctrl-r "me", ctrl-b, ctrl-k
$ rm -f delete
But I still use fzf because while I used to do the above, fzf offered more advantage that made switching worth it.
Was the tape to cover the write protect notch on the floppy?
If it’s not a tree, why call it a branch? Maybe branch doesn’t make any sense either. Maybe none of this makes any sense! Oh my God, what are we even doing here?!?! Ahhhhhhhhhhhh!
I’ll never understand why we didn’t just go back to saying “trunk”.
Well, since you asked… I’m waiting for guile-emacs to make a breakout like neovim did.