aport@programming.devto
5 months
As someone who has worked a lot with both, I think that’s a very measured reaction to seeing Nix
- 0 posts
- 53 comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: June 9th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
- aport@programming.devtoProgramming@programming.dev•Experienced software developers assumed AI would save them a chunk of time. But in one experiment, their tasks took 20% longer6 months
I’m talking from my personal, daily experience using codex.
- aport@programming.devtoProgramming@programming.dev•Experienced software developers assumed AI would save them a chunk of time. But in one experiment, their tasks took 20% longer6 months
Codex literally lies about being connected to configured MCP servers.
- aport@programming.devtoProgramming@programming.dev•Experienced software developers assumed AI would save them a chunk of time. But in one experiment, their tasks took 20% longer6 months
My job believes the solution to this is a 7,000 line agents.md file
- 6 months
Was this article written by AI? It’s full of errors. Local D-Bus traffic is not TCP/IP, and Arch didn’t write dbus-broker, they just set it as their default bus implementation same as Fedora.
- 2 years
God bless openwrt
You can not highlight text in a commit message and leave an in-line comment in the same way you can for code changes in the diff.
GitHub doesn’t let you comment on the commit message either. The only one I’ve seen do this properly this is Gerrit. And of course regular old mailing list reviews.
There are so many blogs and posts about writing good commit messages, using Conventional Commits, etc, and the two most popular forges don’t even let you comment in-line on the commit message during a review.
GitLab still doesn’t even support leaving comments on a commit message. Like, what? GitLab and GitHub have all these fancy shiny features but still suck at offering basic code review functionality.
I never understood the appeal.
- aport@programming.devtoProgramming@programming.dev•Why Facebook does not use Git – and why most other devs do • DEVCLASS2 years
I’m confused, the behavior you just said was “exactly the same in git” is now a problem for Mercurial?
- aport@programming.devtoProgramming@programming.dev•Why Facebook does not use Git – and why most other devs do • DEVCLASS2 years
Old, unreachable commits will be garbage collected.
Lol bro used signed char to store the version number
Thanks my dude!
Extremely happy. Debian Stable. Every time I open the lid of my laptop, it’s working and ready to go. Wonderfully boring and exceedingly reliable.
You fools it’s supposed to contain them, now they are on the loose.
First off nobody can agree on anything, ever, so this is some fantasy world that will never exist.
Second, I’ve seen this complaint for at least 20 years and yet the Linux ecosystem is stronger than ever.
Fragmentation is a strength, not a weakness. There are amazing developers who would never have had the opportunity to contribute if development was monolithic like you are proposing.
- aport@programming.devto
This will be a nice quality of life improvement for embedded folks. Right now we have to use mkimage from u-boot. It’s not a huge problem but it’s nice to have the tools included with the kernel.
My emacs is sitting at 360 MB but I consider it an IDE