I hate this phrase because it assumes that copyright infringement was at one point the same as stealing - it never was.
Stealing is a crime, where you take with the intent to deprive. Copyright infringement is a civil offense where the original owner loses nothing.
Literally, they should be paying users for their comments, not charging them.
They’re even less intrusive when you block them.
I mean, a jellyfin server is typically full of copyright protected material. I also wouldn’t expect them to notify you in advance, however they should still send some notice when they stop providing the service you’ve paid for.
Not the one you replied to but they’re probably talking about Kagi. I crunched the numbers a while back and the higher tiers were kind of hard to make worthwhile, however iirc they simplified the pricing slightly since then.
Yeah man, loads of good people died in 2016, it was a whole thing.
Why did you have to say that?! RIP Robin Williams :(
I almost got it by switching to landscape, but still not quite.
“Old”. This was after I started reading it.
At the same time, it’s about 1200 strips before the latest, which is like 7 years ago? But still not even halfway back, not quite.
Man, he’s been around since forever.
The author has absolutely no fucking clue what the code in this project does. It might just fucking work or not, there is no third option.
lmfao
My thoughts exactly!
Now, with cve-rs, you can corrupt your program’s memory without corrupting your program’s memory.
At least 3 backups, 2 different media, 1 offsite location.
I feel this in AutoCAD (lack of) precision.
Not only that, but these “bootcamps” aren’t exactly going to be churning out the highly skilled people needed to really make good use of AI systems.
Yes but ultimately covid 19 had a relatively low fatality rate. It’s still high compared to things like cold and flu, but low compared to many other diseases. Before the vaccines, young people generally didn’t die, it primarily affected the old and vulnerable.
While it absolutely is a concern - in particular that China is developing these things with apparent malicious intent - there is likely going to be some sort of engineering trade off between fatality and transmitability.
Even then, a 100% fatality rate likely has very poor transmission.
Also, this is China, so claims of effectiveness should be taken with a grain of salt.
Yeah I know, however when you reply to someone from a notification you just want to reply.
Also, when you move up the context on a Lemmy thread you see each comment and all its other comments. If the comment chain you’re replying on isn’t the top thread, then you get cluttered up with all the others. On reddit, context meant you only saw the comments that directly lead to the comment you were deriving context from. Furthermore, context was derived from the comment URL with a ?context=3 suffix, so you could easily specify how far up the chain you wanted to go.
Lemmy does context differently, but I prefer reddit’s method.
Before the trial happens, it could really go either way, even if the defendant is obviously in the right - there could be some procedural slip up that causes them to lose anyway.
However, a lawyer isn’t going to assume that they will make some slip up, so if it is obviously in the defendant’s favour they will work pro bono. There is still some risk for them, because if they lose they don’t get paid, but they’re confident they’ll win.
Edit: wrote the reply thinking this was a conversation about awarding costs to the defendant, that was a different thread. The first paragraph remains unchanged though.
I wish Lemmy showed you more of the context than just the last reply.
I was thinking more about the occassions where there is no news article whatsoever, but you make a good point also.
I sure hope they don’t plan on having more than 2 anniversaries.