Nah. Any use is “fair use”, thanks

So Lennart didn’t have a problem with systemd being prepared to comply with some local legislation , then refused the revert because “don’t bring this conversation here”. I am calling bullshit

Yup. Worst part? We’ve produced people who make this justified: users and idiotic managers (really hard for me to estimate which of them are bigger source of shit). And we keep producing them

I no understand nano. I hate key combinations

What a nice way to say “I can’t back my standpoint up”. Anyway, do have a good day

Lol. Go on, show me how it is easier to understand structure of the code when I am 3 levels down, first two are already out of sight

No, it is an argument against it. We indent code so that it is more comfortable to read it, not in order to make it easier to understand

Human and machine read differently. If you ignore that (in case with indentation), then why bother with writing human-friendly form of code, when what is going to be really executed is something else?

Because I am not counting white space when I read. Or should we just write machine code/assembler/pick something straight away?

You are not alone, my friend

Just don’t use inheritance where more than a few descendants are predicted

Now I’m almost considering learning the language

As I’ve been enlightened recently, “but you see, it’s hard to create a .desktop link in GNOME, so microslop rulez”

Yeah, I can hardly believe my eyes

Which is why in my Windows days I got a habit of turning computer off with Windows + R --> shutdown -s -f -t 0

Windows just works, my ass :)

they can be automatically moved to have parent 1 or something like that, so only way to kill them is a reboot. But personally I am yet to setup a stationary (uh, not a laptop) computer and see how it works for me without poweroff at the end of the day

Windows:

• program refuses to shutdown
• system: okay, guess you don’t need your computer to turn off anyway

About sums it up:)

So you have no evidence or anything else of substance to prove that your statements are true. Have a good day

Lol. Once again: I am not getting an explanation, see hallucinated functions and packages (that never happened, right?)

I know what I am doing, which is exactly why I get paid for my code.

And we know a lot more about how we think than you imagine, lol. Like, humans do not think in words. But you did not know that, did you?

Except you are not getting an explanation. Sheesh, do we really need to go all over the “token prediction machine is unable to understand” iteration, again?