So you use a programming llm instead of a generic one….
Or do you think all llms and ai are the same?
Can’t answer the question eh?
What a shocker.
If you can’t explain your or justify your side, I’ve got no time for people like you.
Because that’s how they work…? It’s not an actual physical book… you don’t seriously think this do you…? it’s the text data inside, like any other text file it would use for context.
Where do you think it gets its data from…?
Why are you so focused on just the training? The data is ALSO the issue.
Of course if you ignore one fix, that works, of course you can only cry it’s not fixable.
But it is.
Why do you think it’s solely a training issue?
Where do you think the errors are coming from? From data bleed over, the word “coding” shows up in books, so yes the context would incorrectly pull book data too.
Or do you not realize coding books exist as well…? And would be in the dataset.
If it’s constantly making an error, fix the context data dude. What about it an llm/ai makes you think this isn’t possible…? Lmfao, you just want to bitch about ai, not comprehend how they work.
Sounds like you have no clue what an LLM/AI actually is or is capable of.
https://medium.com/sciforce/step-by-step-guide-to-your-own-large-language-model-2b3fed6422d0
It’s not hard to keep a data library updated for context, and some are under a TB in siz.
Where are you getting your information from?
If you’re using likely and might, it’s just rose coloured glasses.
The freedom is going to make those issues WORSE.
We are already seeing it with how users use the mod log and previous comments as gotchas while ignoring the content. Reddit dealt with those issues and even had automated systems of dealing with these issues.
I’ve seen more posts derailed than stay on topic here, the lack of moderation is its own issue as things stew before they get dealt with as well. Then the mod just nukes everything as it’s easier. If they even do.
It’s the worst of everything and it’s barely holding on. Maybe it’s partly the instance I’m on, but there’s lots of posts with similar gripes I’ve seen as well.
Public mod logs I’ve seen been used for flaming users, I’ve yet to see it be used for what it was designed for.
It’s great in theory, but without proper logging or context, people just glance at the logs, see the bans and/pr removals and flames the user. Which is against the rules! If you’re using it for that, just don’t engage, but people would rather try and use it as a gotcha. While missing context 100% of the time.
If you can’t engage the user and need to usr a public log to launch an ad hominem attack instead of trying to engage the topic, you’re the issue with Lemmy. And this is what the logs are used for unfortunately.
And as stated, the fact that a mod can just encore stuff out of spite (happens) and they don’t even need to provide a reason, or a notice to the user. So they don’t even know they goofed most times.
Always reminds me of this story
Love the weirdness of codes and laws that allows stuff like this.
… all it can take is going to a website from a windows device… maybe less, it was literally discovered a couple days ago…
It’s not like having IPv6 enabled on a windows machine automatically makes it instantly exploitable by anyone out there.
Yes it actually kinda does, that’s why this exploit is considered the highest priority and critical.
But sure… downplay it, because we only think servers are at risk…
Yeesh buddy.
Great, so let’s suppress a warning because YOU are fine…
Maybe other people don’t realize the issue, but of course you aren’t thinking about anyone but yourself now aren’t you?
And now your entire system/network is vulnerable because of it. Great idea!
Any device on the network would make it vulnerable, what does a server have to do with anything?
Wouldn’t any windows device in your network be vulnerable? And from there everything else.
IPv6 was just found to have a critical exploit, and the solution is to disable it.
Bill
2x orders chicken tenders $10 =20
Bill total $10 - 20/2 = 10…
Huh… I wonder what the issue is……
Clearly you don’t, because context data modifies how the training data extrapolates.
You can use something, while not being educated on how to use it. And just using something does not mean you understand how they work. Your comments have made it QUITE clear that you have no idea.
People who just whing about AI and pretend they know how they work are the worst kind of people right now.