…superPAC dedicated to funding policies that hold IT organizations liable for the consequences of their actions.

Don’t be. I’m trademarking it and selling it for next Rolex line.

It’s mostly the same as how you would sixty-nine someone except you unfurl your proboscis first.

R-word emigrant, checking in.

I think I might have grown up “Trick XOR Treating” rather than “Trick OR Treating.” If I remember right, it returned “False” for “True” values of both “Trick” and “Treat” but not either and not none.

Sync user, checking in.

Plot twist: you use AI to perform the interview and do the job for you.

Congress is aware. That’s why they abdicated their responsibility to the Supreme Court.

You’re still functionally correct.

When money is speech, speech is not free.

Eventually, yeah, but they’ve been propped up by venture capital for a long time.

They will realize nothing. They might capitulate if you manage to cost them money, though.

What? No. That would be outrageous. They don’t make claims that we should kill leftists. They just argue that leftists shouldn’t be allowed in the workplace. Also, unemployed people aren’t entitled to food, shelter, medicine, or citizenship. Also, people who steal food, shelter, or medicine should be imprisoned and forced to work for free. Also, recidivists and those who refuse to work for free should be killed. So, no, they’re not openly stating that the woke left should be killed.

Excellent point. I didn’t think of that. If we can say, “kill all terrorists,” we should be able to say, “kill all fascists” because, as we all know, fascists are terrorists.

Just because it’s locally consistent with its own rules does not mean it’s globally appropriate in an ethical sense. I believe that’s the point being made here.

Cake or death!?

No, not our Steve Huffman. He’d never do anything unethical, much less authoritarian.

I don’t know who was worse, Hitler or the guy that fired him.

Congratulations on your rejection by fascists!