People sure say some silly things while arguing that truth is objective

This implies Tony knows of a zero day nobody else could find, and didn’t bother to tell anyone for thousands of years.
Respect, that’s old school.
Goddess of madness and rebirth. Excrucian Strategist. Capitalised They/Them. Anarcho-Antireal theorist.
Join !soulism if you like My takes.

This implies Tony knows of a zero day nobody else could find, and didn’t bother to tell anyone for thousands of years.
Respect, that’s old school.
People sure say some silly things while arguing that truth is objective
Thanks to @oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone for telling Me about this article. I can’t wait for a captcha that asks if I’m a goddess

That’s right, nuttin’! Here’s the modlog:

This mod clicked ban, saw the box to put in a reason, and put nuttin’ in it.
Jokes aside, the last thing I did in that community was say “mods, remove this slop please”, in the comments under an AI generated meme, posted by a mod. I thought that was funny, but it might have been why the mod decided to ban Me. But the mod didn’t see any reason to put that in the modlog, which is where reasons to ban people go.
EDIT: I was unbanned
Al took My job!
I don’t think it has anything to do with paranoid delusions.

The lady who spearheaded age verification in Australia is either the most useful idiot who ever lived or a lying snake. She talked about forcing us all to give our pictures to Peter Thiel like it was bringing the corporations to account.
Remember when morgius morged all over those guys?
Damn
I actually think that’s the best case because it would kill enterprise adoption of AI overnight. All the corps with in-house AI keep using and pushing it, but every small to medium business that isn’t running AI locally will throw it out like yesterday’s trash. OpenAI’s stock price will soar and then plummet.

The Matrix protocol sends the channel name and icon from server to user client. It’s one extra field to add the ordinality. Two extra fields to add the category and ordinality. Adding your idea onto My idea so users can also reorder channels after the space moderator orders them would be ideal, but please don’t mistake My suggestion for the idea you came up with.

Your group arrangement should either be under user account preferences, or local client settings
I disagree. On Discord, channels are sorted and grouped by the server admins. This is good UX design because it gives every user on a server the same experience of the channels, and doesn’t require users to all replicate a bunch of the same work.
What you’re proposing as a solution is that every single user in a Matrix space is responsible for sorting and grouping all of the channels in the space that they’ve joined. That’s a ridiculous proposal because 99% of users aren’t going to go to that ridiculous effort, they’re going to be happy with the default settings. I think your idea is better than Matrix’s current setup, but it’s far worse than Discord from a usability perspective.
I don’t really use this community, but I ban a lot of accounts that talk like an AI, use em dashes excessively, and come to this community to promote “their” projects. 🤔