If the dependency static links the library and doesn’t use structs or classes defined in it for its interface then it is fine. If either of those are not true it is asking for trouble
- 0 posts
- 215 comments
- Feyd@programming.devto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev•...are you JetBrains or Anthropic, or? // Instead of actually valuable settings, there's "Claude Code Plugin".
3 monthsSo you don’t have a real reason. Cool cool cool
- Feyd@programming.devto
Programmer Humor@programming.dev•...are you JetBrains or Anthropic, or? // Instead of actually valuable settings, there's "Claude Code Plugin".
3 monthsWhy? I haven’t used it to verify, but my understanding is that similarly to JavaScript, it has evolved into a fully featured and ergonomic language. Is that incorrect?
- Feyd@programming.devto
Linux@programming.dev•Fish Shell 4.6 Brings Better Emoji Handling, Bash Compatibility
3 monthsDash isn’t bash compatible. It’s strictly a posix shell
- 3 months
if you build a standard and no one follows it. then it’s wasted time and money. Meta, Google and Microsoft
Google, Microsoft, and Apple also already account for the vast majority of desktop OS installations
the issue is, VPNs hide your ISPs assigned IP. till now there has been a higher difficulty in differentiating traffic from the same IP with similar metadata. the more user specific metadata that’s added, the easier it is to differentiate devices and users.
And you think that the data they get being “is an adult” or “is a child we’re not allowed to collect data on”, per the API part of the specification is useful for that?
If Microsoft and Google are also angling for this why is it only meta lobbying?
I think meta has some scheme to profit from this stuff, possibly also at the expense of Google, Microsoft, Apple in addition to consumers.
- 3 months
Mandating thing like this by law is bad. But having a standard on its own is not.
I agree with this. Here’s where it gets weird. All these bills stem from meta lobbying. Why do they regulation in this specific thing when they’re totally capable of forming a standard committee or something with Microsoft and Google?
Codeinabox specifically seeks them out to post them here to push their narrative.
The puzzle didn’t disappear; it moved to a higher level of abstraction.
LLMs aren’t a layer of abstraction. An abstraction allows you to pretend there is nothing under it (except when it leaks). LLM coding is more like having a pair of hands that you control indirectly and aren’t innately aware of what was been produced.
LLM coding assistants produce faster results whether anyone is being paid or not,
This is still not true when you account for externalities such as that the “faster” people haven’t taken the time to actually understand what they’ve submitted and have produced more tech debt.
- Feyd@programming.devto
Linux@programming.dev•The Engineer Who Tried to Put Age Verification Into Linux
3 monthsIf you don’t bomb that hospital someone else will do it
- Feyd@programming.devto
Programming@programming.dev•AI still doesn't work very well, businesses are faking it, and a reckoning is coming
3 monthsfear of losing your job is a powerful source of motivation
I just feel good when things I make are good so I try to make them good. Fear is a terrible motivator for quality
- Feyd@programming.devto
Linux@programming.dev•Terminal Recommendations? I want Yakuake mixed with Tabby
3 monthsYakuake is built with all the same components as and shares configuration with konsole. It’s specifically quake mode konsole
Roll it back and go home.
There is a fundamental difference this post is pretending doesn’t exist.
Trusting the abstractions of compilers and fundamental widely used libraries is not a problem because they are deterministic and battle tested.
LLMs do not add a layer of abstraction. They produce code at the existing layer of abstraction.
- Feyd@programming.devto
Linux@programming.dev•Steam hardware survey for February 2026. What happened? Why did it lose such a big percentage?
4 monthsOh is it this time again? Every several months there is an influx of Chinese devices and this discussion happens. It’ll likely be up again next month. Have fun with the wild speculation I guess
- Feyd@programming.devto
Linux@programming.dev•Bcachefs creator claims his custom LLM is 'fully conscious'
4 monthsYou’re completely sidestepping what I actually said and attempting to get me to defend something I didn’t say. Very honest of you
- Feyd@programming.devto
Linux@programming.dev•Bcachefs creator claims his custom LLM is 'fully conscious'
4 monthsI bet your cat is more intelligent than some people…
- Feyd@programming.devto
Linux@programming.dev•Bcachefs creator claims his custom LLM is 'fully conscious'
4 monthsDev-ops
Jokes aside what I’ve been seeing is people that say (for things other than yaml files)
I understand all of it
And missing subtleties that would have been noticed in the course of writing it the old fashioned way
- Feyd@programming.devto
Linux@programming.dev•Bcachefs creator claims his custom LLM is 'fully conscious'
4 monthsI’m not even surprised. This is 100% on brand for that weirdo
Cry in the bathroom



I haven’t touched PHP in like a decade but I don’t remember anything as frustrating in my entire career as dealing with python package management.