
The lesson is, have nukes.

The lesson is, have nukes.

Yes. It’s also a series of felonies. Having a persons username and password does not give one permission to access the account anymore than having possession of someone’s house key allows one to legally enter the home.
That someone will eventually be a hacker.

Admits they aren’t an expert, claims they know what good architecture is.
That is about the most competency one can expect from anyone pushing this sort of tech.
Actual experts know its severely limited. Dunning-Krugers cannot.

Knowledge worker burn out is real. The idea that this is some inevitable future is nonsense. Feels like a hedge from some who bought the hype.
Any company that tries will end up cannibalisizing productivity.
It’s like claiming that if supercars became affordable everyone will of course start traveling at 120 mph in average. When the reality would be wasted energy and fools wrapping themselves around trees.

If it’s doesn’t work for you, it’s because you’re a failure!
Still not convinced these LLM bros aren’t junior developers (at best) who someone gave a senior title to because everyone else left their shit hole company.

Yeah, not all people who enter the industry should be doing so.
Most of this was boomers being boomers and claiming anyone and everyone should code.
a trivial context as swapping a head tag and removing script tags.
Very curious what it actually generated here because that sounds really basic but as coders we tend to downplay complexity when describing things (why our documentation is often bad) so maybe it’s more than just some trivial dom manipulation.
no experience with JavaScript to speak of
You claim no JavaScript experience, declare confident in the comments and include any examples.
All you’ve really said here is you vibed coded a solution to a problem using one of the most common languages without knowing the language. And made claims you do not attempt to prove.
That’s when a “here be dragons” comment needs to be added.
Hundredth time is definitely still that first one.
Cool story.
The good massively outweighs the bad.
That’s your opinion.
I know I have stopped purchasing as many games because the average quality has tanked.
What part of this is irony?
The fact that they have favorite games using these engines has absolutely nothing to do with there being massive amounts of garbage games. The shit take is yours.
Your product is an LLM tool written with LLM tools. That’s is hilarious.
If the goal is to see how much middleware you can sell idiots, you’re doing great!
This entire comment reads like lightly edited ai slop.

The difference being that Lemmy supports multiple communities with the same name.
If an instance is allowing their communities to be sold, they can be defederated.

If I could go back in time and do something else, I’d do the same thing again.
So many questions here. What language? What’s the database? How many years of experience do you have in industry?
We are the worse evaluators of our own code, some of us are down right terrible but most people regret less significant code choices in a matter of months. The fact that you still think it is good 10 years later is a massive red flag.
Some of them will “do math” but not with the LLM predictor, they have a math engine and the predictor decides when to use it. What’s great is when it outputs results, it’s not clear if it engaged the math engine or just guessed.