• 0 posts
  • 32 comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: June 24th, 2025
  • When the workers control the government, unions are redundant at best and reactionary bastions that will impede progress at worst, which we saw them stike at the behest if the CIA in Allande’s Chile and Sankara’s Burkina Faso.

    I support unions in europe, I don’t support their enemy, the capitalists and their governments.

    Workers have better conditions in europe, due to colonial history and crumbs afforded by the threat of socialism, but the state isn’t run by and for the working class as in AES countries.

  • purely worker basis

    Workers having more crumbs while still being subservient to capital doesn’t make them more socialist.

    So it’s state capitalist then?

    It uses markets to solve specific problems.

    you take the word of the rich when they colour themselves as the government

    There are rich whom are party members, and are even less independent than rich people who have no connection to the government. We can infer they are not in control from the government’s actions, from not propping up property prices to reeducating or even executing capitalists who commit social murder.

    bizarre to me to be arguing for a nation you’re not a part of.

    I’m not a nationalist, this isn’t team sports.

    wouldn’t it make more sense to support socialism in the West

    Of course I support most any anti-capitalist party. But I’ve pretty much given up hope for the west.

  • China

    Conditions for the workers in China have massively improved over the last 75 years. They continue to improve, as opposed to say, India which continues to export food while farmers hunger.

    it’s cheap, including the labour

    Due to central planning covering the major industries, everything is cheap in China, when you can get a good meal for 30 cents-2USD, and rent is 300USD, 1500USD/mo goes pretty far.

    Cuba, despite 70 years of siege and US-backed terrorism, manages a higher HDI than every Caribbean nation, and a higher life expectancy for her people than America.

    Western nations

    China doesn’t have the luxury of stripping the global south for labor and resources. There’s a reason all those countries remain eternally “developing” while China actually manages to improve conditions.

    Russia

    Russia hasn’t been socialist for 35 years.

    one of socialism’s core values is the eradication of private ownership, such as private property, which China still has.

    Private property has been a useful tool to develop the means of production. The capitalist class however, remains subordinated to the interests of the working class, as such we occasionally see one take a trip to a farm upstate when they step outside their lane. By 2050, Xi said it will no longer be necessary, so we should expect further reductions in the capitalists independence.

  • You confuse not supporting America’s hostile actions against foreign countries with supporting the actions by those governments.

    The alternative stance, supporting hostile action against, China, Cuba, Iran, Russia, Venezuela, etc because they’re “authoritarian” is not materially different from the most blood thirsty ghoul who supports hostility because they believe they are inferior people whose labor and resources should be subjugated by the west.

    Presumably you’re a liberal who understands Iraq and Libya are not a better places today because we “liberated” them from their authoritarian regime, and maybe you see through zionists who argue in bad faith that we can’t support Palestine because the struggle for LGBT+ rights hasn’t advanced as much, but maybe you’ve noticed a pattern that 1. being subjected to western media and education, you get a wildly distorted perspective of places America intends hostile action, and 2. Supporting hostile action against “the regime” from the west just means hostile action against those people. An Iranian might protest and organize to advance their struggle, the US starving and/or bombing them does not help them.