- 3 years
I’m sure they’ll let you stick to the classic branch like TW3.
No one’s screwing your over by making a version of the game that uses more up to date hardware.
- 3 years
They update the game with tons of fixes and content, but now required a better system to run smoothly, and all that for free.
I can’t believe people bitching about free shit. But sure, disagree with such extreme opinion is cOrpORatE bOOtLiCkER 🙄
- 3 years
It would still suck, if you were able to run the game before, but after a patch you can’t play anymore. I’d hope you can switch back to the old version, which would render this “outrage” completely moot.
- HairHeel@programming.devEnglish3 years
well, “Genesis does what Nintendo won’t do”, therefore Genesis must run Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p 60fps.
- 3 years
They recommend a better computer now that they’ve added more CPU heavy interactions to the game, go figure. How has the minimum changed?
- 3 years
The original requirements were absolute horseshit. Game performance was ass even if you did hit those marks, and the poor saps trying to play it on last gen consoles got shafted the hardest. I heavily doubt the upgrade is going to significantly overhaul graphical options, you’ll just have the same shitty time trying to run it at smooth 60fps as you would have pre-patch. CDprojektred just finally decided to stop outright lying.
- 3 years
So my 5900x is below the supported threshold?! Gues I’ll not get their expansion then.
- 3 years
My guess is that 7800X3D is a mistake, and they mean a 7700 or 7700X. I’ve seen an image of one of the devs, who initially made the post to check your CPU cooler, where it was edited to an 7800 (which doesn’t exist).
This is still pretty beefy, but not like “you need the best gaming CPU” beefy. A comparable, Ryzen 5000 8+ core CPU is probably going to work too, so something like a 5800X, 5900X, etc. Ryzen 3000 might be too old already, but I’m just speculating here.