Sources say the decision was made by how long interns spent in each editor. In fact, it appears the vim users simply never exited once they opened the program, presumably because they found it so productive.
You must log in or register to comment.
- theluddite@lemmy.mlEnglish2 years
We need to set aside our petty differences and fight the true enemy: bloated IDEs.
- 2 years
Bah, a magnetised needle and a steady hand is the one true way to edit code on your prod system.
- theneverfox@pawb.socialEnglish2 years
Hah, still relying on butterflies? Real programmers simply use the starting conditions of the universe to understand where their program will spontaneously compile
- 2 years
I used to have my local environment synced to prod. Saving meant deployed.
Everything was feature flagged by default, we never broke production in years. That was early 2010s.
You shouldn’t let your Visual ideas be Eclipsed, by something Sublime…
- Err(()).unwrap()@lemmy.worldEnglish2 years
And between the two of them, a thin line of evil-mode users who claim allegiance to both sides.
- 2 years
This is what kicks off the second Civil War in the United States. And just the like first time, those treasonous Emacs Confederates will be decisively defeated.
2 yearsBegone, spawn of evil!
Allow the light of Church of Emacs into your heart!
- LemonLord@endlesstalk.orgdeleted by creator2 years
White House are not Emacs guys!? That’s not surprising. They believe in ‘you can’t change the program, but the program changes you’.
- 2 years
On (classic) rock stations so much when I was a kid that it makes me want to stab myself in the ears?
I think the guideline should be: future software should be written on a whim
- 2 years
I tell myself I can quit vim, but somehow I keep going back to it…
Emacs just starts too slowly. Helps to break the dopamine cycle.
