You must log in or register to comment.
- 1 year
Really cool way of picturing an IP dataframe!
Like if you’re dropping it at a post office and praying it’ll get to where you need it to, which makes it rather remarkable that it actually does get there.
- 1 year
Yeah but if you tick TCP and pay the extra postage you can get proof of receipt.
- 1 year
Though ‘finding’ the UDP packet should cost a lot more, because, whoever knows where it is?
- 1 year
TIL my school has blocked mastodon, but not lemmy, X, reddit, or anything else for some reason
Anyways, very funny, tho I dont understand half of it
- 1 year
Maybe they didn’t block mastodon but .social domain for “security” reasons, with other less common domain names probably in some black list like .zip.
- 1 year
Would be better if it was for a one of the April 1 RFCs, like 1149…
RFC791 is the formalization of IPv4 itself. Which goes back to 1981.
- 1 year
Carriers being attacked by birds of prey. RFC2549: “Unintentional encapsulation in hawks has been known to occur, with decapsulation being messy and the packets mangled.”
- _____@lemm.eeEnglish1 year
It’s about TCP, lookup TCP packet or TCP header
I don’t understand why I’m being downvotes but alright.
The joke is NOT about TCP it’s something else entirely
1 yearhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datagram#Internet_Protocol%3Fwprov=sfla1 it’s like meta data on data packets it’s lower level then udp and tcp
- 1 year
Original title is lost packet form, yours is lost package form (emphasis mine).
- creamlike504@jlai.luEnglish1 year
My brain autocorrected so hard I didn’t realize it was wrong until this comment.
- Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.worldEnglish1 year
That’s why the Internet is broken - there’s no “Let roommate sign for it” field.
