I have a Dockerifle:

ARG CADDY_VERSION=2.11.3
FROM caddy:${CADDY_VERSION}-builder-alpine AS builder

RUN xcaddy build \
    --with github.com/caddy-dns/cloudflare

FROM caddy:${CADDY_VERSION}-alpine

COPY --from=builder /usr/bin/caddy /usr/bin/caddy

and the docker-compose.yml file I have this snippet at the top, of course this isn’t the full file as there are specifics to my usecase in my full yml:

services:
  caddy:
    pull_policy: build
    build:
      context: .

And to build new versions I modify the Dockerfile after doing a docker compose down, and then to build the new version I use docker compose up.``

Though this is outdated for my current setup, as I also use github.com/lucaslorentz/caddy-docker-proxy by adding “–with github.com/lucaslorentz/caddy-docker-proxy/v2” below where I added the Cloudflare repo.

This is so I can use Docker Labels to to automate entries.

I have a Dockerifle like that:

ARG CADDY_VERSION=2.11.3
FROM caddy:${CADDY_VERSION}-builder-alpine AS builder

RUN xcaddy build \
    --with github.com/caddy-dns/cloudflare

FROM caddy:${CADDY_VERSION}-alpine

COPY --from=builder /usr/bin/caddy /usr/bin/caddy

and the docker-compose.yml file I use:

services:
  caddy:
    pull_policy: build
    build:
      context: .

And to build new versions I modify the Dockerfile after doing a docker compose down, and then to build the new version I use docker compose up.

I currently build my own Caddy docker container with a Dockerfile using xcaddy and the caddy-builder-alpine image.

xcaddy adds these github.com/caddy-dns/cloudflare github.com/lucaslorentz/caddy-docker-proxy/v2

I’ll give it an install and put it through its paces. Appears to be a good option for me upon reading about it.

Privacy is important to me, however with visual needs dictating my use of dark mode; librewolf had that going against it for my use case.

Hey all good by me. Different setups for different folk!

I use a combination of a custom built Caddy Docker container, Technitium for DNS, and DNSWeaver.

Automated DNS Entries, Automated Reverse Proxy entries all with Docker labels.

The reverse proxy is infernal. I type sub.domain.tld to get to my internal site. All with automated certs.

Makes it so I dont have to remember IP and port combos

Feishin on Desktop. Symfonium on phone. (I can also recommend Tempo, which is open source but doesn’t work over Android Auto last I tried.) To host my music I use Navidrome. Which I have setup as a docker container, behind a reverse proxy. The files are stored on my NAS. To access remotely I have Wireguard setup. That being said, to use Android Auto with Symfonium while my Navidrome is only accessible on my network or over VPN I use split tunneling otherwise Android Auto throws a fit.

Between my desktop (i7-12700KF, 64GB of DDR4 3600MT/S, Copper modded EVGA RTX 3090, 1000W power supply), 2 Power Edge servers with 2 750W power supplies each, heartened my entire old apartment.

During the summer it sucked 😆

I have oddly enough downsized. I have a few rack mount dell power edge servers, and one is fairly beefy (dual Xeons, 180GB of ddr4, 24 bays for 2.5 inch drives) bu5 the power cost and noise.

Now I run a few small form factor lenovo PCs, with a standalone NAS, and a few Raspberry pis.

I run 30ish containers on one lenovo.

If i ever get a house, I’ll bring back the power edges.

I quite like the option! I do love tasker, but if i only need auto tunneling this does it quite well!

Have you tried [https://github.com/zaneschepke/wgtunnel](WG Tunnel)

I use this WG client and it has options for auto-tunneling

I always used CUE splitting software to separate tracks.

Spotify is trash

I went and jumped off the deep end and went straight to Arch with my main rig. However without reading and tinkering you won’t exactly have a fun time. But if you’re comfortable enough with command line, then you can get it working how you want. It does work quite well now that I have it setup. Even with Zen kernel and NVIDIA open dkms.

I am glad to have jumped on when I did. A few years have passed, and almost everything I hadba gripe over is fixed.

I’ve wanted to give NixOS a shot, but I have very little reason to switch away from Arch. I have my install tailored to be exactly what I want. No fuss in maintaining it either.

Where’s the /s

Arch has been the least limiting experience I have had with Linux thus far.

You wanna delete system files, do it, I dare you. Oh, it broke your system? Okay, not a problem. I haven’t encountered a situation it wasn’t recoverable. You wanna test bleeding edge custom kernels with drivers that are the newest available? Done.

If you’re afraid of reading, troubleshooting, and trying new things to test your mettle? Yeah, go with something else.

There is very little I haven’t been able to do with my Arch setups. I ditched Windows, and can’t go back.

Just be aware of what you are installing. And do your best to audit your system regularly. Switching to a bleeding edge distro, and using thebAUr absolutely comes with risks. But it is up to the user to be aware of what they are installing. This goes for any OS. Be aware of what you are installing.

This can happen on any OS you install software willy nilly with no thought behind it.