display_name@lemmy.ziptoProgramming@programming.dev•JetBrains working on higher-abstraction programming language
11 months
“JetBrains is exploring how to make this new language a derivative from Kotlin, but Skrygan believes the derivative should be English.”
That sounds like (Visual) Basic. It looks like English but it’s basically pseudo-code.
I’m happy letting AI and my language server write all the extra annotations for Rust, i’ve no trouble reading them. I have much more trouble when types and usage specifiers/limiters are missing.
I’m trying to come up with a good pun how ownership and safety could have prevented this but…
use std::sync::OnceLock;
#[derive(Debug)] struct BrainCell { in_use: bool, }
static BRAIN_CELL: OnceLock<BrainCell> = OnceLock::new();
fn get_brain_cell() -> &'static BrainCell BRAIN_CELL.get_or_init( }) }