3 months
You must log in or register to comment.
- 3 months
Define Nazi cos I’ve found most peoples definition tends to be “anyone who isn’t as left wing as I am”.
- 3 months
I checked your comments and you are one.
This user believes in white replacement and other Nazi stuff if you want to block them.
- Keshara@piefed.worldEnglish3 months
Did you see that users comments on trans suicide stats… on that fucking thread!!..
This user is just a piece of shit
- 3 months
I though people liked having all the scientific data available to them when making permanent life altering decisions. Do u not believe in science? Or only when the facts are convenient?
- 3 months
Modlog also full of them being one.
https://lemmy.world/modlog?page=1&actionType=All&userId=13162145
Including defending Charlie Kirk and saying nazis are actually socialists because they put it in the name 🙃
- 3 months
I was proud of that one. Even went a made a meme and all.
- 3 months
Wow defending Charlie kirk makes u a Nazi huh? It seems my definition is very fitting lol. If u had read a single fucking book written by high ranking Nazis u would see the clear socialism.
- 3 months
Yes he was one and defending him is defending a nazi.
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2024/02/charlie-kirk-whiteness-turning-points-usa/
. If u had read a single fucking book written by high ranking Nazis u would see the clear socialism.
Please enlighten us
- 3 months
So the guy known for talking to anyone regardless of political orientation (left, right, fucking everyone) is a Nazi cos he talked to some people who you think are Nazis?
Let’s apply your logic:
- You think the people Charlie spoke to where Nazis.
- Because he spoke to them he is therefore a Nazi.
- I’m defending Charlie kirk which by your claims makes me a Nazi.
- Your having a conversations with me would thus make you a Nazi (by the same logic u used to define Charlie as a Nazi).
It seems logical consistency is not your strong suit.
- 3 months
Charlie Kirk was a white national selected to lead and build turning points usa, which most campuses hate because it’s a massive hate organization (ie white nationalist conservative apparatus).
He was known for debating and only showing the parts he was able to talk over the other person or when talking to those he agreed with.
I’m glad you’re finally admitting you are pro nazi
- 3 months
Is socialism the only part you look at? Whether they used capitalism or socialism or any other fiscal ism has very little to do with the fact that it was authoritarian and fascist. Kirk was a horrific figure for anyone to support because he supported the same kinds of authoritarian and fascist doctrine that dominated the Nazi regime. This is to say nothing of his promulgating hateful rhetoric regarding anyone that wasn’t a straight white christian male.
- 3 months
My argument was that the national socialist where in fact socialist. I was not and am not defending the rest of their ideology.
Please link me the clips of Charlie supporting fascist Nazi doctrine. Since your so confident this should be very easy.
This is to say nothing of his promulgating hateful rhetoric regarding anyone that wasn’t a straight white christian male.
That’s a load of bullshit: Clip 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OOp4zBkJ14 Clip 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJmcqjP8mhk
- 3 months
If you cared about evidence we wouldn’t be talking and you wouldn’t be defending him.
Here’s a link you’ll ignore and hand wave.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/11/charlie-kirk-quotes-beliefs
- 3 months
At some point between viewing this thread and responding it got removed. But just a few posts up I saw this:
https://lemmy.world/post/45032005It’s exactly this. Good callout
- 3 months
When did I say anything about white replacement? What Nazi things do I believe cos I sure as shit don’t recall supporting them.
- 3 months
It seems some mod got buthurt over some words and decided to ban me from everywhere they could then remove a factual and well thought out argument that had raised no prior concerns. The bias this shows is to some degree fascist behaviour but the irony of that will go right over ur head.
- verdi@tarte.nuage-libre.frFrançais3 months
You can open the link and see for yourself. It’s like a schoolyard in the bronx in the 80s…
- 3 months
I had to scroll up a few posts. But it encapsulates this exact exchange. Well done.
https://lemmy.world/post/45032005
- 3 months
That’s not a definition that’s an ideological lecture trying to mascaraed as a comic.
Their is also a direct correlation between the number of words in a meme or comic and the shitness of said meme or comic.
- LiveLM@lemmy.zipEnglish3 months
Racism. In the Computer Monitor discussion group. Why are people the way they are? 😐
- kyub@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish3 months
I’ve always wondered where the line was, or how blurry it is, between “haha, look at us, we’re the PC masterrace and those are the console peasants” and actual chauvinism…
- 3 months
One is an obvious joke, the other isn’t. Anyone who takes PCMR to the level of racism or chauvinism is a problem, and usually one the rest of the “group” will call out.
And to be clear, I’m using “group” very loosely here, because it’s not like there are any sort of hard line on who is part of PCMR, just wanting a PC and not being able to afford one is “good enough”. Anyone gatekeeping is also a problem.
